Amb. Celac: NATO is the main source of security against Russian aggression

The New Geopolitics Research Network brings to your attention the video and main points of the speech of Amb. Sergiu Celac, Honorary Chairman of the New Strategy Center, Romania at our on-line discussion “Intermediate-range Missiles in Europe: Arms Race, Conflict, Deal?”.

The main theses:

– Romania’s military planning includes the aim of spending at least 2% of GDP on defense for the next 10 years with at least 20% for a new weapons and modern equipment.

– Romania signed an agreement to purchase 7 Patriot surface-to-air missile systems from the U.S. Army, one of which has been already delivered and currently operating. The others will be delivered during the next 4 years. The acquisition of Patriot air defense systems and HIMARS long range rocket artillery systems enhance interoperability with Romania’s main ally, the United States. Planned acquisition of short and very short range air defense system (SHORAD) will operate in an integrated mode with the Patriot missiles and will replace entirely the Soviet systems.

– Considering the surface-to-surface mobile systems, Romania is introducing the HIMARS mobile system with ranges up to 300 km. For the land operation of Romanian army, it has received a hundred mobile units such as LAROM multiple rocket launcher, developed by Romanian companies jointly with Israel on the basis of Russian “Grad” concept. Furthermore, most of the programs include provisions for local manufacturing and technological transfer aimed at reviving the country’s state owned defense industry.

– For coastal batteries and equipments for navy missile and other warships, the legacy soviet “Rubezh” systems were replaced with modern NATO units with ranges up to 80 km.

– While Russia has complained about NATO’s expansion to include countries that had been in the Eastern Bloc during the Soviet era, NATO’s eastern members, including Romania, see the alliance as the main source of security against growing Russian aggression.

– NATO’s preference today is not to be actively involved in any actions in the Pacific and in particular in the South China Sea. NATO officials always make a clear distinction between Russia and China in terms of strategic confrontation. Russia is seeing as potential adversary and China is seeing as the systemic rival and competitor, but it has never been mentioned as a potential military adversary.

– More should be done to strike a reasonable balance about the attention, given to the two crucial regions – the Eastern flange of NATO and the European Union. The same attention should be paid to the Baltic and Black Sea regions.

– Any bargaining in the bilateral mode between the US and Russia should be necessarily proceeded by more consultations within NATO (by the US with NATO and by the US with EU). US should start consulting with the friends before going to battle field with adversary.

Watch the full video of the conference “Intermediate-range Missiles in Europe: Arms Race, Conflict, Deal?” (17.03.2021) here: https://youtu.be/rYwsql1ArCM

Mykhailo Samus

NGRN Director

After 20 years in media as well as in security and defence analysis and consultancy, Mykhailo is an experienced researcher in the sphere of international relations, national resilience and new generation warfare. Served 12 years in the Ukrainian Armed Forces, he gained his Master’s Degree in International Journalism from the Institute of Journalism, Kyiv Shevchenko National University (2007). Having started his career as a journalist at Defense Express, he became the Editor-in-Chief of the Export Control Newsletter magazine, and then the Deputy Director of the Center for Army, Conversion and Disarmament Studies.

He was the founder (2009) of the EU CACDS office in Prague (Czech Republic), and was responsible for the coordination of CACDS international activities, its regional sections, and projects with NATO and the EU. Mykhailo also was the member of the editorial border of the CACDS Analytical Bulletin Challenges and Risks.

Now Mykhailo is a chief and one the drivers of new international project – The New Geopolitics Research Network which is an independent and nonpartisan initiative to provide a think tank platform for researchers, academics, experts, journalists, intellectuals who aspire to shape a new facets of geopolitics.

Contact Us
March 2021
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031